Theological theory of sex

The theological theory I will propose now sounds as a heresy or an “unholy” thing. In fact, I am not sure if it is really supported by the Bible, however surely there is some evidence for it which I will present now.

The idea is the following: The problem of relations between Christ and the Church is mathematically equivalent to the problem of relations between the husband and the wife. Something like to try all poses (not poses, they seem to be already tried, but to try all feelings more likely).

(Eph. 5:23) “For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the savior of the body.” The problem of control over the wife (especially in sex) is equivalent to the problem of salvation of the church.

(Eph. 5) 21 Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God. 22 Wives, submit yourselves to your own husbands, as to the Lord. 23 For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the savior of the body. 24 Therefore as the church is subject to Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing. 25 Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it; 26 That he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word, 27 That he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish. 28 So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that loves his wife loves himself. 29 For no man ever yet hated his own flesh; but nourishes and cherishes it, even as the Lord the church: 30 For we are members of his body, of his flesh, and of his bones. 31 For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall be joined to his wife, and they two shall be one flesh. 32 This is a great mystery: but I speak concerning Christ and the church. 33 Nevertheless let every one of you in particular so love his wife even as himself; and the wife see that she reverence her husband.

The first thing (21) is to submit each ones feelings to one another. It is to feel pleasure as a mean to please the another. The woman should feel pleasure as a way to satisfy his husband’s desire to please the woman (and vice versa). (22) continues this thought especially for women. The problem of woman feeling pleasure to satisfy her husband is mathematically equivalent to the problem of submitting to the Lord. (23) The husband controls the pleasure of the wife and this is mathematically equivalent to control of Christ over the church. This is the formula of salvation in the material world (“body”). (24) Need to try all ways to subject wives to husbands (especially in sex). It is mathematically equivalent to the Church being subject to Christ. (25) Husbands should do sex to the wives, this is mathematically equivalent to love of Christ to the Church and His sacrifice for the Church. (26) Talk about sex with your wives. (28) may perhaps be interpreted that a loving husband to do masturbation: a woman worth love definitely sometimes may be too busy, he may do this thinking about the wife. But masturbation makes no sense, one may say. It makes some sense: To load the organism for possibly better health, to train for sex, to make pleasure to the wife through telepathic link. One may say that it is a wrong way of doing things, but we are in the process of  transition to the future Kingdom which will be different than the original creation, and in transitions sometimes silly things happen. I’d advice to avoid ejaculation during masturbation to allow for more sex with the wife (except if she is in a travel). (28) seems to say that a husband should feel in sex like as he feels in masturbation, it may mean to do it just a physiology but use this physiology to think about the woman and enjoy her. Whether you do masturbation or not “He that loves his wife loves himself.”, this means that if one loves his wife then he receives pleasure from the process of pleasing the wife, from the pleasure of the wife itself, not just from his physiology. Only a man who wishes good for himself (not suicidal) can truly love his wife. (29) seems to say that penis is to be trained for better sex. (32) speaks about a mystery that is a hard mathematical problem or a cipher, the problem to be solved is about Christ and the Church, the marital relations are a mean of its solution. (33) says that participating in solving this angels’ mathematical problem is for everyone of us. (33) seems to again reference that sex with the wife is to be modeled after masturbation. How to interpret “the wife see that she reverence her husband”? The Strong’s Greek dictionary translates “reverence” also as “(passively) to be alarmed” , doesn’t it mean something like to be excited “passively”?

By the way the above explains a reason why sexual magic sometimes works.

I am yet unmarried. After my weird sexual adventure I decided (see the comment from the page of the last link) to find a girl to marry. I want my wife to believe me, read my writings, and know mathematics.

Leave a Reply